it's still deep enough to suck you in for a long time, but intuitive enough to ease into as a new player, since your main objective is basically just to paint the map. if you've never played a grand strategy game, EU4 is probably a good bet. There is no question that EU4 is more casual than Vicky2. They really dont play anything alike even though the UI appears similar at a glance. You may also suggest "Just fucking pick whichever one you faggot" and that is perfectly reasonable well. I'm sorta leaning on getting EUiv now, but I still may be swayed. Box art is ehh, sorta average nothing too special.Īnother anon also suggested EUiii, as it may encompass aspects present in both EUiv and V2. ~300 years and less historical basis would result in games with less predictability, this game is considered more appealing to a new player of GS, and would also offer more replay for different reasons. Plus, that is some sexy box art.ĮUiv on the other hand, can be said to have somewhat more content, and even more more extra content though that extra content can be extremely costful via DLC prices, therefore would make any actual purchases result in incompletion of content, though others mention yohoho'ing would be the best route for that extra stuff. Some say V2, though cheaper and complete, can be a bit too complex for a player new to grand strategy, though shorter timeframes allows for quicker replays, is more detailed and focused on certain aspects of government and population influence yet some games can be similar to each other as larger nations tend to follow certain paths as the game is more historically based. Please do correct me if I made an error below: I had posed this question yesterday but ai would still like to get a few more opinions before I make a decision. Victoria 2 vs Europa Universalis IV Anonymous 16:55:22 Post No.
0 kommentar(er)
